As promised last blog, I offer some differences between mainline churches and house churches.
I believe God intended people to be gathered in small groups where people can search scripture together, develop deep and life-long relationships, nurture each other to love and good works, encourage spontaneous and daily worship and jointly serve the people around them. I believe the model of church that is most popular in our culture is so different from what God intends. House churches pervade the New Testament.
Regardless of the many good things that come from mainline churches, they are generally a perversion of God’s plan, incapable of fully functioning according to God’s ideal. Yet, God has worked his will through the ages even within the flawed structure we know as church. In fact, one could easily be blinded by the many good aspects and fail to see what might be possible if every Christian were to see him/herself as a missionary in their own neighborhood.
For those who think I have an axe to grind with the mainline church, I’m sorry to disappoint you. I sincerely believe my observations come from pure motives, as one who truly wants to see God’s people live up to our calling of imitating Jesus in this dark world. Just as we can’t serve both God and money, we can not serve both God and religion. And that’s what is happening today.
Please receive these observations in the spirit they are offered—as encouragement to God’s people to return to the model of church He outlined in scripture. We owe it to the Father to get this as right as we can.
- Mainline churches (just churches from here on) focus on “attracting” and “doing” rather than “going” and “being.” This is an important difference. Churches spend lots of resources attracting adherents to their buildings, assemblies and programs. Yet, churches generally reach only those who are willing to “come” (to church or church activities) and who are willing to conform their lives to the rituals and practices of that church. House churches put no such burden on seekers. House churches meet any place and any time people want to meet (sometimes “daily”. Now, that’s a novel idea).
- Churches plan everything to be comfortable first for the community of believers. House churches strive to make life safe and fulfilling for the “not-yet-believers.”
- Churches require “all or nothing.” You’re either in or you’re out—no gray area. Many of those involved in house church have not yet made a commitment of faith but share fully in the life of that small community while continually refining their faith. (Jesus attracted many people in the “gray area” and allowed them to participate in his life despite their level of faith or lack of.) In house church, people don’t have to be at a certain level to participate in the life of that community. We are all on a journey, and we are not absorbed with who’s in and who’s out.
- Churches have to be the center of all activities. House churches promote the neighborhood (board room, emergency room or school room) as the center of activity.
- Churches demand to receive a portion of benevolent resources from members. House churches trust participants to use their resources to help people, not maintain buildings, salaries or programs. At times, participants in a particular house church decide to pool their resources for a special project. In those cases, everyone has a say in how corporate funds will be used.
- Churches tend to create weak, dependent members who rely too much on what church leaders tell them. Mainline church members are generally handed a theology and expected to adhere. In house churches, there is no hierarchy; all members are peers and search scripture together to uncover truth. Differences of opinion can co-exist peacefully in a house church.
- Churches focus on peripheral matters. Being truly on the “front lines,” house church members don’t have time to focus on such less vital issues (i.e. forms of music, facility maintenance, what other religious groups believe, politics, etc.), but are consumed instead with each other’s well being, love for “not-yets”, social issues (poverty, discrimination, human suffering), and environmental concerns. These are issues that spring from the very heart of God.
Now, in all honesty, some house churches can (and do) look and act more like a mainline church as described above. When that happens, it too becomes a perversion of God’ plan for his people. But the chances of that happening are lessened when participants in the group take personal responsibility for holding on to God’s model of church.
I would truly like to know your thoughts. If you are in a house church, tell us about it and how it fulfills you. And those in a mainline church, if you take issue with what you read above say so, and share why you are involved. If you have experienced any of the above where you go to church, we’d like to hear about it.